
Conflict is unavoidable in the workplace. If you’ve led long enough, you must’ve encountered two great employees, one small spark, and suddenly the whole team feels like it’s walking on eggshells.
This guide is about how to mediate conflict between employees in a way that protects trust, keeps work moving, and improves culture over time. Who should read this? Leaders who want a repeatable result when conflicts arise in the workplace.
When people hear “conflict”, they often picture raised voices and awkward meetings. In reality, most workplace conflict is quieter than that. It looks like slow handovers, passive resistance, duplicated work, and “You know what? I’ll just do it myself” behaviour.
Research shows that an estimated £28.5 billion per year is spent on workplace conflicts. This is averaging £1,000 per employee per year. Conflicts also hit energy and retention.
In the same study, those who reported conflict were more likely to feel exhausted and under pressure, and were twice as likely to say they might quit. Another thing to note is that conflict eats time. It has an average cost of 4.34 hours per week. It could be one of your most expensive resources.
The Simple Formula
Example: £40,000 salary ÷ 2,080 ≈ £19/hour
Add 30% overhead → ≈ £25/hour real cost
3. Employees: These are the directly involved Employees
Example: 2 employees arguing regularly
→ Employees = 2
4. Hours Lost to Conflict Per Week: Below are realistic benchmarks
5. 52: This is the weekly time lost. To convert weekly loss into annual impact, you multiply by 52 weeks(a year)
| Example | Calculation | Annual Cost |
| Minor tension | 2 ×1×25×52 | £2600 |
| Department tension | 2×3×25×52 | £7800 |
| Escalated Conflict(leadership conflict) | 5×4×25×52 | £26,000 |
NOTE: The table above used 2 employees as an example for the first and second, and 5 employees for the third example. If more employees are involved, the cost eventually goes up.
Most advice says “meditate early.” That’s true, but leaders also need a structure for deciding when to step in and when mediation is the wrong tool.
Think of conflict resolution like a fire alarm system:
Médiation Ladder
Use this ladder to decide how to mediate conflict between employees without guesswork.
Use when: Tension is new, the stakes are low, and both employees still talk to each other.
What you do:
Use when: the conflict keeps resurfacing, and communication has broken down.
What you do:
3. External workplace mediation
Use when: the conflict is between senior leaders, and internal attempts failed. What you do:
4. Formal process (investigation/grievance/discipline)
Use when: there are allegations of misconduct, harassment and power imbalance.
What you do:
Before you decide how to mediate conflict between employees, ask:
If you answer “yes” to any of these, you should consider mediation.
Below is a practical process you can adopt for mediating conflict in the workplace:
If you’re building stronger systems around recognition, feedback, and clear expectations (the things that prevent conflict before it starts), you might like what Perkflow is building.
Here’s a hard truth: many “employee vs employee” conflicts are really system vs human problems wearing a disguise.
If you have to constantly mediate conflicts between employees in the same teams, it’s rarely because your people are difficult. It could more likely mean the workplace is sending mixed signals.
Below are common system-level causes that quietly feed conflict:
Conflicts not only create tension, it drains time, slow execution, and increase errors. That’s why, when we calculated the cost of conflict earlier, one of the biggest bills was hours lost to distraction.
So after mediation, the real question becomes: did performance come back?? This is because if the output did not recover, the conflict is still alive. It has just gone quiet.
Below is an easy scorecard leaders can use to measure whether mediation actually worked, using performance as the anchor.
1) Confirm if the team’s output improved.
For example: Did the deadline get missed or met?
2) Make sure the conversation ended with actions, not just apologies
Example: Did they keep up with each end of the agreement?
If you want to close performance gaps before they turn into conflict, it’s worth exploring Perkflow’s insights on building a stronger feedback culture and improving structure
Clear expectations today reduce the number of conflicts you’ll need to mediate tomorrow.

If you remember one thing, make it this: Learning how to mediate conflict between employees is not just about having better conversations. It’s about protecting performance.
The evidence is clear that conflict is widespread, costly, and linked to pressure, exhaustion, and quitting risk. That’s why workplace mediation can’t be a vague moment.
If you’re building a healthier workplace where goals are clear, performance is backed with fair recognition. The kind of environment that reduces the conflicts you have to mediate. Check out Perkflow
Meta description: Learn how to mediate conflict between employees with a clear escalation ladder, step-by-step workplace mediation process, root-cause fixes, and simple KPIs.
recognition trip ideas, backed by ROI insights and planning tips. You’ll know how to select the right experience, measure impact, and build a recognition program that transforms company culture.